PRODUCTS
- Aerial Bundled Cables
- Airport Cables
- Automotive Cables
- Alarm & Audio & Electronic Cables
- Belden Equivalent Cables
- Bus Cables
- Cable Glands
- Cables for Oil Industry
- Coaxial Cables
- Composite Cables
- Control Cables
- Data Cables
- Elevator Cables
- Fiber Optic Cables
- Fire Resisting Cable(Fireflix)
- Fire Retardant Cable(FIRETOX)
- Flame Retardant Cable (FIREGUARD)
- Flexible Cables
- Heat Detection Cables
- High Temperature Cables
- Highway Cables
- Industrial Cables
- Instrumentation Cables
- Marine Cable
- NEK606 Water Blocked Offshore & Marine Cables
- IEC60092 STANDARD Offshore & Marine Cables
- BS 6883&BS7917 STANDARD Offshore & Marine Cables
- UKOOA Offshore & Marine cables
- VG 95218 Navy Cables
- Mining Cables
- Airframe Wire
- Marine, OIL,GAS & Petrochemical Cables
- Power Cables
- Railway Cables
- Robotics
- Rolling Stock Cables
- Rubber & Crane Cables
- Security Cables
- Special Cables
- Spiral Cables
- Telephone Cables
- Thermocouple Cables
- BS 5308 Cable
- PAS 5308 Cable
- BS 5467 Cable
- BS 6724 Cable
- BS 6346 Cable
- BS 7211 Cable
- IEC 60502-1 Cable
HOT PRODUCTS
APPLICATIONS
|
EN 45545-2 Requirements For Railway Cables
EN 45545-2 Fire Protection Standard for Railway Vehicles
1. Scope & Classification
-
Application Focus: Materials/components for railway vehicles (R15 for in-vehicle cables, R16 for out-vehicle cables)
-
Hazard Levels:
-
HL1: Lowest risk (e.g., low-density urban transit)
-
HL2: Medium risk (e.g., regional trains)
-
HL3: Highest risk (e.g., underground/subway systems)
-
2. Key Performance Requirements
| Test Category | Test Standard | HL1 | HL2 | HL3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smoke Density | IEC 61034-2 (Light Transmittance) | In-vehicle: ≥25% Out-vehicle: ≥0% | In-vehicle: ≥50% Out-vehicle: ≥25% | In-vehicle: ≥70% Out-vehicle: ≥50% |
| Flammability | IEC 60332-1 (Single vertical burn) | Pass | Pass | Pass |
| IEC 60332-3-24/EN 50305 (Bundle test)* | Class B | Class A | Class A | |
| Toxicity | EN 50305 | ≤3.5mg/g | ≤3.0mg/g | ≤2.5mg/g |
*Bundle test selection based on cable diameter
3. Critical Technical Distinctions
-
In-Vehicle vs Out-Vehicle Cables:
-
Smoke density requirements are 25-40% stricter for in-vehicle cables
-
Same flammability/toxicity thresholds for both types
-
Out-vehicle cables may require additional UV/weather resistance
-
-
Material Considerations:
-
HL3 cables typically use ceramic-former insulation
-
Low-smoke zero-halogen (LSZH) compounds mandatory for all levels
-
Additional acid gas emission limits (≤5% HCl equivalent)
-
4. Testing Protocol
-
Pre-conditioning: Cables aged at 120°C for 240h (simulating service life)
-
Sequential Testing:
-
Flammability → Smoke density → Toxicity
-
All tests performed on same sample batch
-
-
Compliance Thresholds:
-
Must meet ALL criteria for designated HL level
-
No compensation between test categories
-
Industry Implementation
-
HL3 Adoption: Now mandatory for all new metro projects in EU (2023 directive)
-
Cost Impact: HL3 cables cost 35-50% more than HL1 equivalents
-
Emerging Solutions:
-
Silicone-based insulation for high HL3 compliance
-
Modular cable trays with integrated fire barriers
-
This standard represents the most stringent fire safety requirements for mass transit applications, with HL3 effectively becoming the new baseline for urban rail systems worldwide. Manufacturers must carefully validate material formulations against the complete test matrix - passing individual tests doesn't guarantee overall compliance.




